<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is KVM a credible choice for x86 server virtualization?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pleasediscuss.com/andimann/20100112/is-kvm-a-credible-choice-for-x86-server-virtualization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pleasediscuss.com/andimann/20100112/is-kvm-a-credible-choice-for-x86-server-virtualization/</link>
	<description>Part-time musings of a full-time technologist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:14:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andi</title>
		<link>http://pleasediscuss.com/andimann/20100112/is-kvm-a-credible-choice-for-x86-server-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-1892</link>
		<dc:creator>Andi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 21:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleasediscuss.com/andimann/?p=137#comment-1892</guid>
		<description>LOL, fair enough. 

But it&#039;s a good point. I know KVM is deployed in prod in big numbers, so it is certainly credible in that sense. 

But niche cases don&#039;t discount the very real problem for most large organizations with diverse virtualization needs. The manageability issues mean it is too hands-on for many or these more &#039;faint-hearted&#039; enterprises :) to scale out and up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, fair enough. </p>
<p>But it&#8217;s a good point. I know KVM is deployed in prod in big numbers, so it is certainly credible in that sense. </p>
<p>But niche cases don&#8217;t discount the very real problem for most large organizations with diverse virtualization needs. The manageability issues mean it is too hands-on for many or these more &#8216;faint-hearted&#8217; enterprises <img src='http://pleasediscuss.com/andimann/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  to scale out and up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryche</title>
		<link>http://pleasediscuss.com/andimann/20100112/is-kvm-a-credible-choice-for-x86-server-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-1889</link>
		<dc:creator>ryche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 17:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleasediscuss.com/andimann/?p=137#comment-1889</guid>
		<description>KVM is not for kids, or the faint-hearted.

It is for professionals, I´ve seen hundreds of kvm machinnes running linux on production environments, so I can´t see a single point on this article, sorry, you must be mistaken with some other user friendly click and install interfaces that turns deployment automation a living hell.

even the performance isn´t matched.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KVM is not for kids, or the faint-hearted.</p>
<p>It is for professionals, I´ve seen hundreds of kvm machinnes running linux on production environments, so I can´t see a single point on this article, sorry, you must be mistaken with some other user friendly click and install interfaces that turns deployment automation a living hell.</p>
<p>even the performance isn´t matched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hypervisors are not commodities &#124; 云生活</title>
		<link>http://pleasediscuss.com/andimann/20100112/is-kvm-a-credible-choice-for-x86-server-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-1464</link>
		<dc:creator>Hypervisors are not commodities &#124; 云生活</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 12:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleasediscuss.com/andimann/?p=137#comment-1464</guid>
		<description>[...] has some catching up to do in areas such as management, I&#8217;m not sure limitations and newness, such as those noted by Andi Mann, are obstacles to the same degree they&#8217;d be if we were talking about a standalone product. As [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has some catching up to do in areas such as management, I&#8217;m not sure limitations and newness, such as those noted by Andi Mann, are obstacles to the same degree they&#8217;d be if we were talking about a standalone product. As [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hypervisors are not commodities &#124; penlau software</title>
		<link>http://pleasediscuss.com/andimann/20100112/is-kvm-a-credible-choice-for-x86-server-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>Hypervisors are not commodities &#124; penlau software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleasediscuss.com/andimann/?p=137#comment-827</guid>
		<description>[...] has some catching up to do in areas such as management, I&#8217;m not sure limitations and newness, such as those noted by Andi Mann, are obstacles to the same degree they&#8217;d be if we were talking about a standalone product. As [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has some catching up to do in areas such as management, I&#8217;m not sure limitations and newness, such as those noted by Andi Mann, are obstacles to the same degree they&#8217;d be if we were talking about a standalone product. As [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Is KVM a credible choice for x86 server virtualization? &#124; Andi Mann – Übergeek -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://pleasediscuss.com/andimann/20100112/is-kvm-a-credible-choice-for-x86-server-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Is KVM a credible choice for x86 server virtualization? &#124; Andi Mann – Übergeek -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 01:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleasediscuss.com/andimann/?p=137#comment-491</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Andi Mann, Gordon Haff, Jason Brooks, ServerVirt_TT, Brad Murphy and others. Brad Murphy said: RT @AndiMann My latest blog: Is KVM a credible choice for x86 server virtualization? http://bit.ly/7MNW15 &lt; well done, wish it wasn&#039;t true. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Andi Mann, Gordon Haff, Jason Brooks, ServerVirt_TT, Brad Murphy and others. Brad Murphy said: RT @AndiMann My latest blog: Is KVM a credible choice for x86 server virtualization? <a href="http://bit.ly/7MNW15" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/7MNW15</a> &lt; well done, wish it wasn&#39;t true. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is KVM a credible choice for x86 server virtualization? &#124; Andi &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://pleasediscuss.com/andimann/20100112/is-kvm-a-credible-choice-for-x86-server-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Is KVM a credible choice for x86 server virtualization? &#124; Andi &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleasediscuss.com/andimann/?p=137#comment-484</guid>
		<description>[...] See the rest here: Is KVM a credible choice for x86 server virtualization? &#124; Andi &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See the rest here: Is KVM a credible choice for x86 server virtualization? | Andi &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is KVM a credible choice for x86 server virtualization? &#124; Andi &#8230; &#124; Linux Affinity</title>
		<link>http://pleasediscuss.com/andimann/20100112/is-kvm-a-credible-choice-for-x86-server-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>Is KVM a credible choice for x86 server virtualization? &#124; Andi &#8230; &#124; Linux Affinity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleasediscuss.com/andimann/?p=137#comment-483</guid>
		<description>[...] the rest here: Is KVM a credible choice for x86 server virtualization? &#124; Andi &#8230;      Posted in: Virtualization ADD [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the rest here: Is KVM a credible choice for x86 server virtualization? | Andi &#8230;      Posted in: Virtualization ADD [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
